X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2095" "Mon" " 7" "February" "1994" "12:37:18" "LCL" "Mike Piff" "M.Piff@SHEFFIELD.AC.UK" "<199402071351.AA10134@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "63" "Re: List environment" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020712:37:18" "List environment" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA06121; Mon, 7 Feb 94 14:52:55 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA12240; Mon, 7 Feb 94 14:51:10 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA10134 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:51:04 +0100 Message-Id: <199402071351.AA10134@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8039; Mon, 07 Feb 94 14:50:55 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8038; Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:50:55 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8601; Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:50:18 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 12:37:18 LCL From: Mike Piff Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: List environment Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1445 %>Date: Thu, 3 Feb 1994 13:06:56 EST %>Reply-to: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project %>From: Paul Krause x7816 %>Subject: List environment %>To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L %> %>> How do others see this? %>> %>> Mike Piff %> %>I think that you are misusing the th environment. In LaTeX 2.09 I %>find that actually having a theorem before the nested list solves the ie, some text. Yes, I know it looks OK then. %>problem. Perhaps something could be done to newtheorem to alert naive %>users to this kind of abuse. %> Why is this misuse? I think you are mis-interpreting the theorem environment as being *only* for theorems. As is clear from p58 of Lamport, the intention was much more general, eg Exercise 2.3 (i) ....... (ii) ...... Mike %>\documentstyle[12pt]{article} \newtheorem{th}{Theorem} %>\begin{document} %>\begin{enumerate} %> \item %> \begin{enumerate} %> \item This looks %> \item good %> \end{enumerate} %>\end{enumerate} %>\begin{th} foo %> \begin{enumerate} %> \item $\leftarrow$This space is too big %> \item %> \end{enumerate} %>\end{th} %>\begin{th} bar %> \begin{description} %> \item [One] Good bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar %> bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar %> \item [Two] Probably this would look better indented bar bar %> bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar %> \end{description} %>\end{th} %>\end{document} %> %>Paul F. Krause Systems Research and Applications Corporation %>(703) 558-7816 Intelligent Information Systems %> FAX 558-4723 2000 15th Street North, Arlington, VA 22201 %>Uucp: uupsi!sra!verdi!krausep------------------Internet: krause@sra.com %> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% Dr M J Piff, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of %% %% Sheffield, UK. e-mail: M.Piff@sheffield.ac.uk %% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%