X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2212" "Sat" " 5" "February" "1994" "11:48:57" "CST" "Alex Stark" "jas1@eng.cam.ac.uk" "<199402051152.AA01422@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "60" "Re: Additional features" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020517:48:57" "Additional features" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA03430; Sat, 5 Feb 94 12:53:32 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA05233; Sat, 5 Feb 94 12:52:12 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA01422 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Sat, 5 Feb 1994 12:52:03 +0100 Message-Id: <199402051152.AA01422@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3616; Sat, 05 Feb 94 12:51:45 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3615; Sat, 5 Feb 1994 12:51:46 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5178; Sat, 5 Feb 1994 12:51:14 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Sat, 5 Feb 1994 11:48:57 CST From: Alex Stark Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Additional features Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1443 In Message Fri, 4 Feb 1994 21:06:08 GMT, Charles Wells writes: > >In a message I posted recently I said > >One of the most important amenities that Latex3 can have is lots .... >This probably means that although an \everychapter, >\everysection, etc, would be _nice_, they probably are not >_necessary_. > >-- >Charles Wells >Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University >10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-7058, USA >216 368 2893 I was glad to find the discussion on this list turning to a topic much more important than compatability and hyphenation. The feature of Latex3 that I await most eagerly is the style design interface. I will be installing LaTeX2e in a few months time. I need Postscript and AMS fonts and AMS-Latex. I have already installed NFSS2. PROBLEM: Latex installation requires too many decisions. I am nearly in a position to decide on DC fonts and other issues, but it has taken a lot of effort. Most of the contributors to this list seem to be familiar with these questions: most of the potential users are not. So, a wish list. For CTAN maintainers, the Latex3 team and systems package authors (eg emtex). For each of the following, 1) Standard fonts; 2) AMS fonts; 3) Postscript fonts; x) Others as required. Make it {\em really} simple to install each option. This means ONE encoding scheme as standard. Even a mere mention of different arrangements should be delimited as `for advanced users only'. Clear intructions as to where the Postscript sources are (even if included in package). This may do something about the frightening confusion of bundles in the archives. In short, anyone competent with computers but with no specialist knowledge of TeX should be able to install Latex without fuss. Alex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- J. Alex Stark Signal Processing and Communications Laboratory Department of Engineering email: jas1@uk.ac.cam.eng University of Cambridge Tel: [+44]223 3 32767 Trumpington Street Fax: [+44]223 3 32662 Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK