X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["427" "Fri" " 4" "February" "1994" "08:58:28" "EST" "Michael Barr" "barr@TRIPLES.MATH.MCGILL.CA" "<199402041445.AA16348@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "10" "Re: Additional features" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020413:58:28" "Additional features" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA02002; Fri, 4 Feb 94 15:45:52 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA00482; Fri, 4 Feb 94 15:45:47 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA16348 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 4 Feb 1994 15:45:43 +0100 Message-Id: <199402041445.AA16348@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7072; Fri, 04 Feb 94 15:45:37 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7071; Fri, 4 Feb 1994 15:45:36 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1811; Fri, 4 Feb 1994 15:04:45 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 08:58:28 EST From: Michael Barr Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Additional features Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1437 I want to thank David Rhead for saying so well some of things I have been thinking during the somewhat heated discussion on backward compatibility during the last week. I probably will have to keep two versions of latex around for a long time, or face the possibility of having to revise certain things. But I don't want backward compatibility to compromise the new version. So, one vote for getting it right. Michael Barr