Message-Id: <199402031806.AA15081@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  <9402031637.AA13447@uu5.psi.com> (M.Piff@SHEFFIELD.AC.UK)
Date:         Thu, 3 Feb 1994 13:06:56 EST
From: Paul Krause x7816 <krausep@SRA.COM>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      List environment
Status: R

>  How do others see this?
>
>  Mike Piff

I think that you are misusing the th environment.  In LaTeX 2.09 I
find that actually having a theorem before the nested list solves the
problem.  Perhaps something could be done to newtheorem to alert naive
users to this kind of abuse.


                                        -paul


\documentstyle[12pt]{article} \newtheorem{th}{Theorem}
\begin{document}
\begin{enumerate}
   \item
   \begin{enumerate}
      \item  This looks
      \item  good
   \end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
\begin{th} foo
   \begin{enumerate}
      \item $\leftarrow$This space is too big
      \item
   \end{enumerate}
\end{th}
\begin{th} bar
   \begin{description}
      \item [One]  Good bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar
        bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar
      \item [Two]  Probably this would look better indented bar bar
        bar bar bar bar bar bar bar bar
   \end{description}
\end{th}
\end{document}

Paul F. Krause          Systems Research and Applications Corporation
(703) 558-7816          Intelligent Information Systems
 FAX  558-4723          2000 15th Street North, Arlington, VA 22201
Uucp: uupsi!sra!verdi!krausep------------------Internet: krause@sra.com