X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["593" "Thu" " 3" "February" "1994" "10:31:41" "+0100" "Bernard GAULLE" "gaulle@idris.fr" "<199402030935.AA14166@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "14" "Re: Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020309:31:41" "Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" nil nil])
Return-Path: <owner-latex-l@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93)
	id AA28423; Thu, 3 Feb 94 10:36:35 +0100
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93)
	id AA21796; Thu, 3 Feb 94 10:35:03 +0100
Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA14166
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 10:35:01 +0100
Message-Id: <199402030935.AA14166@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 5340; Thu, 03 Feb 94 10:34:55 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by
 TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5338; Thu,
 3 Feb 1994 10:34:55 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by
 VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2336; Thu,
 3 Feb 1994 10:34:28 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Date:         Thu, 3 Feb 1994 10:31:41 +0100
From: Bernard GAULLE <gaulle@idris.fr>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Another optional argument for \section etc. ?
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1415

>>>>> Le Thu, 3 Feb 1994 08:46:52 GMT,
>>>>>    Adrian F Clark <alien@essex.ac.uk> ecrit concernant "Re: Another option
al argument for \section etc. ?" :
    JKM> May I ask for this new feature?
    /.../
AC> If one is allowe to vote new features in, I would also be very pleased
AC> to see this.

Though every people (and me too) would like to add new features to the system,
is-it really the time to propose new features? IMHO a beta version must
not be modified by adding new features, otherwise a new beta test would
be required and final version will not be released as planned.

  --bg