X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["680" "Thu" " 3" "February" "1994" "08:46:52" "GMT" "Adrian F Clark" "alien@essex.ac.uk" "<199402030848.AA13007@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "17" "Re: Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020308:46:52" "Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA28369; Thu, 3 Feb 94 09:49:25 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA21551; Thu, 3 Feb 94 09:48:24 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA13007 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 09:48:19 +0100 Message-Id: <199402030848.AA13007@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5041; Thu, 03 Feb 94 09:48:13 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5040; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 09:48:13 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2099; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 09:47:46 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: "KNAPPEN%VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE@uk.ac.essex.mailhost"'s message of Wed, 2 Feb 1994 20:35:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 1994 08:46:52 GMT From: Adrian F Clark Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Another optional argument for \section etc. ? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1413 On Wed, 2 Feb 1994 20:35:34 +0100, "J%org Knappen, Mainz" said: JKM> May I ask for this new feature? JKM> Add a second optional argument to the command \chapter, \section, etc. in JKM> the following manner: JKM> JKM> \section[toc entry]{Actual section header, maybe looonnnngggg}[Running head] If one is allowe to vote new features in, I would also be very pleased to see this. There are quite a few occasions where I have had to start fiddling about with running heads just because the section title is rather long. Such a feature would be upwards-compatible (very important IMHO) and increase flexibility. ...Adrian