X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["392" "Wed" " 2" "February" "1994" "20:59:02" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK" "<199402022106.AA28050@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "13" "Re: Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020220:59:02" "Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" nil "<9402022024.AA08105@ftp.tex.ac.uk>"])
Return-Path: <owner-latex-l@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93)
	id AA27511; Wed, 2 Feb 94 22:06:13 +0100
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93)
	id AA19067; Wed, 2 Feb 94 22:06:12 +0100
Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA28050
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Wed, 2 Feb 1994 22:06:10 +0100
Message-Id: <199402022106.AA28050@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0473; Wed, 02 Feb 94 22:06:04 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by
 TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0472; Wed,
 2 Feb 1994 22:06:03 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by
 VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8852; Wed,
 2 Feb 1994 22:05:37 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  <9402022024.AA08105@ftp.tex.ac.uk>
Date:         Wed, 2 Feb 1994 20:59:02 GMT
From: Sebastian Rahtz <spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Another optional argument for \section etc. ?
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1408

"J%org Knappen, Mainz" writes:

 >
 > Add a second optional argument to the command \chapter, \section, etc. in
 > the following manner:
 >
 > \section[toc entry]{Actual section header, maybe looonnnngggg}[Running head]
 >
is it LaTeX interface `style'? but i agree with the sentiment
wholeheartedly: toc and running head are not the same thing. i too
often get irritated by this.

sebastian