X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["470" "Wed" " 2" "February" "1994" "20:41:24" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK" "<199402022049.AA27721@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "12" "Re: \\normalshape" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020220:41:24" "\\normalshape" nil "<9402022024.AA08122@ftp.tex.ac.uk>"])
Return-Path: <owner-latex-l@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93)
	id AA27483; Wed, 2 Feb 94 21:49:12 +0100
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93)
	id AA18938; Wed, 2 Feb 94 21:49:10 +0100
Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA27721
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Wed, 2 Feb 1994 21:49:07 +0100
Message-Id: <199402022049.AA27721@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0365; Wed, 02 Feb 94 21:49:02 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by
 TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0364; Wed,
 2 Feb 1994 21:49:02 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by
 VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8738; Wed,
 2 Feb 1994 21:48:38 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  <9402022024.AA08122@ftp.tex.ac.uk>
Date:         Wed, 2 Feb 1994 20:41:24 GMT
From: Sebastian Rahtz <spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: \normalshape
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1406

Joachim Schrod writes:
 >
 > You wrote:
 > >
 > > I learned about this command in NFSS1, and have used it extensively in my
 > > research papers for two years now. Does what you've discussed about it
 > > vanishing from LaTeX2e mean that I'll have to edit each and every one of
 > > those *.tex files if i need to reproduce *.dvi files?
surely the real question is `why did you use \normalshape in each and
every .tex file'? why isnt it once in a style file?

sebastian