X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["565" "Wed" " 2" "February" "1994" "20:35:34" "+0100" "J%org Knappen, Mainz" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" "<199402022028.AA27195@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "17" "Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020219:35:34" "Another optional argument for \\section etc. ?" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA27386; Wed, 2 Feb 94 21:28:45 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA18803; Wed, 2 Feb 94 21:28:42 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA27195 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Wed, 2 Feb 1994 21:28:40 +0100 Message-Id: <199402022028.AA27195@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0180; Wed, 02 Feb 94 21:28:33 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0179; Wed, 2 Feb 1994 21:28:33 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8595; Wed, 2 Feb 1994 21:27:25 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Wed, 2 Feb 1994 20:35:34 +0100 From: "J%org Knappen, Mainz" Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Another optional argument for \section etc. ? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1402 May I ask for this new feature? Add a second optional argument to the command \chapter, \section, etc. in the following manner: \section[toc entry]{Actual section header, maybe looonnnngggg}[Running head] If one optional argument is omitted, the obligatory argument is used instead. Reason: LaTeX 2.09 allows to use one shortened form of the section header, which however goes both in the running head and the table of contents. This is very unfortunate, since I want to be more verbose in the table of contents then in the running head. Yours, J"org Knappen.