X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2092" "Wed" "26" "January" "1994" "17:52:06" "-0500" "Rainer Schoepf" "schoepf@SC" "<199401270935.AA00148@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "78" "Posting to latex-l" "^Date:" nil nil "1" "1994012622:52:06" "Posting to latex-l" (number " " mark " Rainer Schoepf Jan 26 78/2092 " thread-indent "\"Posting to latex-l\"\n") nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA10898; Thu, 27 Jan 94 10:35:59 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA01775; Thu, 27 Jan 94 10:35:52 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA00148 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Thu, 27 Jan 1994 10:35:46 +0100 Message-Id: <199401270935.AA00148@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0518; Thu, 27 Jan 94 10:34:59 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0517; Thu, 27 Jan 1994 10:34:58 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5616; Thu, 27 Jan 1994 10:34:30 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Comments: Resent-From: schoepf@sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (Rainer Schoepf) Comments: Originally-From: wtt@bellcore.com (William T. Trotter) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 1994 17:52:06 -0500 From: Rainer Schoepf Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Posting to latex-l Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1319 Greetings from New Jersey, which recently has looked and felt more like Alaska! Several posts to latex-l have raised the issue of the "layout" of the standard latex documentstyle article.sty. Count me as among those who think it is particularly unattractive - independent of any discussion about paper sizes. Recognizing all the pitfalls inherent in designing good style files, there must be some relatively competent people out there who have taken up the challenge. Some would argue that amsart.sty is a good example. Are there others? If somebody knows of the existence of particularly "nice" style files for LaTeX articles, I surely would appreciate learning how one might acquire a copy. Has anyone ever raised the idea of having a "competition" for style files? Wouldn't it be fun to have a set, say of 6, really attractive style files - available on CTAN servers - from which to choose in writing an article? I have in mind style files which are as easy (or easier) to use as article.sty with more or less the same constructs. So the user prepares a file which is something like: \documentclass{greatart} \usepackage{amstex,amssymb} \begin{document} \title{} \author1{} \address{} \curraddr1{} \email1{} \author2{} \address{} \curraddr2{} \email2{} ... \thanks1{} \thanks2{} \thanks3{} \begin{abstract} ... \end{abstract} \maketitle \section{Introduction}\label{s:intro} ... \end{thebibliography} \end{document} AND out comes a really beautiful document! Now if the paper goes to a journal with radically different formatting requirements, things can be adjusted with a minimum of trouble. Now that we have all these wonderful LaTeX2e tools, shouldn't we pay a little attention to "beauty"? Cheers, Tom Trotter ======================================== William T. Trotter Director, Combinatorics and Optimization Bell Communications Research 445 South Street 2L-367 Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1910 ======================================== Telephone: (201) 829 - 4175 Fax: (201) 829 - 2645 E-mail: wtt@bellcore.com ========================================