X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["640" "Mon" "17" "January" "1994" "14:50:53" "+0100" "Peter Dalgaard SFE" "pd@KUBISM.KU.DK" "<199401171432.AA29281@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "15" "Re: dc fonts and LaTeX2e" "^Date:" nil nil "1" "1994011713:50:53" "dc fonts and LaTeX2e" (number " " mark " Peter Dalgaard SF Jan 17 15/640 " thread-indent "\"Re: dc fonts and LaTeX2e\"\n") nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA01333; Mon, 17 Jan 94 15:32:54 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA06556; Mon, 17 Jan 94 15:32:52 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA29281 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Mon, 17 Jan 1994 15:32:48 +0100 Message-Id: <199401171432.AA29281@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0540; Mon, 17 Jan 94 15:32:55 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0539; Mon, 17 Jan 1994 15:32:55 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2629; Mon, 17 Jan 1994 15:30:58 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 17 Jan 1994 14:50:53 +0100 From: Peter Dalgaard SFE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: dc fonts and LaTeX2e Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1282 > Type 1 encoded LaTeX2e needs dcss8 at 5 points. However, mfjob chokes on this > with the following error message. What should I/LaTeX2e do? > > Mike Piff For the time being just accept it. The probability of anyone needing the hatted characters in scriptscriptsize sans serif must be small. In a slightly longer perspective, something needs to be done about fine-tuning the DC fonts (another and much more important problem with them is that dcr12 tends to have too thin tops of round characters like o and e, to my taste and also as compared with cmr12). And yes, Rainer, this is the wrong place to discuss it! Peter Dalgaard