X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2559" "Fri" "14" "January" "1994" "20:13:17" "GMT" "David Carlisle" "carlisle@cs.man.ac.uk" "<199401151348.AA09005@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "76" "Bugs in latex2e" "^Date:" nil nil "1" "1994011420:13:17" "Bugs in latex2e" (number " " mark " David Carlisle Jan 14 76/2559 " thread-indent "\"Bugs in latex2e\"\n") nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA20509; Sat, 15 Jan 94 14:49:36 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA00299; Sat, 15 Jan 94 14:48:54 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA09005 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Sat, 15 Jan 1994 14:48:47 +0100 Message-Id: <199401151348.AA09005@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8458; Fri, 14 Jan 94 21:15:58 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8457; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 21:15:58 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6463; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 21:15:28 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 20:13:17 GMT From: David Carlisle Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Bugs in latex2e Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1276 This list (and the latex-bugs mailbox) are getting several reports of the same bugs in the current release of LaTeX2e. While this is not such a bad thing (it is better a bug be reported lots of times rather than not at all) we are currently trying to put together a second release that fixes many of these bugs. This release will be available real soon (I would say next week, but I would not be so bold as to make predictions on release dates:-) The following is a list of some of the things fixed. It is not a full list, and doesnt include various optimisations and improvements we have made internally. However if one of these bugs bites you, you dont need to let us know. Some of the items I have included a fix, This is for your information, I am not suggesting that you should `patch' the current release. Thanks for your help in testing this (and sorry about the bugs:-) David Bugs that will be fixed `in the next release' ============================================= 1) The installation guide install.l2e file has been rewritten. Amongst other things we have indicated how to run both LaTeX209 and LaTeX2e on the same machine. And documented that the .def files should be moved, as well as the .sty and .cls files to a directory on the input path, 2) In fontdef.dtx the old files nft1.def and nfot1.def are input instead of t1.def and ot1.def. 3) In docclass.dtx a typo will mean that the new command \@ifpackageloaded will not work. Undefined command \@pkgetension should be \@pkgextension 4) In Compatibility mode (ie documents starting with \documentstyle) The option list is not correctly handled by certain non-standard options. (it does work OK with article report etc) \@obsoletefile in latex209.cmp should look like \def\@obsoletefile#1#2{% \expandafter\let\csname opt@#1\expandafter\endcsname \csname opt@\@currname.\@currext\endcsname \wlog{Compatibility mode: inputting `#1' instead of obsolete `#2'.}% } 5) pandora.sty doesnt work as \NeedsTeXFormat has been mis-spelt as \NeedsFormat 6) some missing font definition (fd) files will be added. 7) \label now works in \eqnarray 8) \pounds is fixed 9) float-in-list fixed Brief description of bug: LaTeX2e will not split a list environment around a figure which appears before the list even though there is some room to do so (see demo file). The old version of LaTeX splits the list. 10) The new command \enlargethispage works. The bug is that the commands \@gbsphack and \@gesphack (which are not defined) should be replaced by \@bsphack and \@esphack