X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["740" "Mon" "10" "January" "1994" "12:33:38" "+0100" "Rainer Schoepf" "schoepf@SC" "<199401101145.AA15678@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "20" "Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd" "^From:" nil nil "1" "1994011011:33:38" "missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd" (number " " mark " Rainer Schoepf Jan 10 20/740 " thread-indent "\"Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd\"\n") "<199401101018.AA13029@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA10012; Mon, 10 Jan 94 12:45:34 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA26472; Mon, 10 Jan 94 12:45:33 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA15678 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:45:31 +0100 Message-Id: <199401101145.AA15678@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3772; Mon, 10 Jan 94 12:45:43 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3680; Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:45:43 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0415; Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:34:01 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199401101018.AA13029@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> From: Rainer Schoepf Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd Date: Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:33:38 +0100 Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1266 Mike Piff writes in response to a message by me: > %> > %>Please note that complaints like this should not be sent to the > %>LaTeX-L list, but to the advertised mail address > %> > %>latex-bugs@rus.uni-stuttgart.de > %> > > I for one would rather hear about such complaints immediately on this list. > Could anyone who finds such problems kindly ignore above advice;-) I would rather see this list discussing problems related to LaTeX3; that's what it was created for, not for specific LaTeX problem reports. As I pointed out in the part of the message quoted by Mike Piff, for the latter we have a dedicated mail address, allowing us to direct problem reports into the proper channel and react to them quickly. Rainer Schoepf