X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["304" "Mon" "10" "January" "1994" "10:01:32" "LCL" "Mike Piff" "M.Piff@sheffield.ac.uk" "<199401101018.AA13029@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "9" "Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd" "^From:" nil nil "1" "1994011010:01:32" "missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd" (number " " mark " Mike Piff Jan 10 9/304 " thread-indent "\"Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd\"\n") nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA09906; Mon, 10 Jan 94 11:20:22 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA26159; Mon, 10 Jan 94 11:18:50 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA13029 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Mon, 10 Jan 1994 11:18:17 +0100 Message-Id: <199401101018.AA13029@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2941; Mon, 10 Jan 94 11:18:31 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2940; Mon, 10 Jan 1994 11:18:29 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0067; Mon, 10 Jan 1994 11:17:34 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Mike Piff Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: missing Ueuf.fd and Ueus.fd Date: Mon, 10 Jan 1994 10:01:32 LCL Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1265 %> %>Please note that complaints like this should not be sent to the %>LaTeX-L list, but to the advertised mail address %> %>latex-bugs@rus.uni-stuttgart.de %> I for one would rather hear about such complaints immediately on this list. Could anyone who finds such problems kindly ignore above advice;-)