X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["676" "Fri" "7" "January" "1994" "18:26:59" "+0000" "Robin Fairbairns" "Robin.Fairbairns@cl.cam.ac.uk" "<199401071830.AA03755@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "18" "Re: The extent of compatibility" "^Date:" nil nil "1" "1994010718:26:59" "The extent of compatibility" (number " " mark " Robin Fairbairns Jan 7 18/676 " thread-indent "\"Re: The extent of compatibility\"\n") nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA08003; Fri, 7 Jan 94 19:31:01 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA19060; Fri, 7 Jan 94 19:30:14 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA03755 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 7 Jan 1994 19:30:01 +0100 Message-Id: <199401071830.AA03755@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3063; Fri, 07 Jan 94 19:30:17 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3062; Fri, 7 Jan 1994 19:30:17 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3504; Fri, 7 Jan 1994 19:29:23 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jan 94 16:44:09 GMT." <"swan.cl.cam.:18062 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 1994 18:26:59 +0000 From: Robin Fairbairns Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: The extent of compatibility Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1262 Sebastian writes: |> i think seminar is an exception, because it uses NFSS1 for its font |> stuff. I suspect that seminar isn't terribly exceptional (lots of styles use NFSS1 or lfonts-style stuff) |> i am using it with no problem, but using LaTe2e/NFSS2 font |> packages. i havent noticed this smallness Martyn reports. The smallness is a result of the effect I described in my first bug report (ignoring options in a \documentstyle command). This is a bug that's "fixed in the next release", I'm told (I have a work-around). R -- Robin (Campaign for Real Radio 3) Fairbairns rf@cl.cam.ac.uk U of Cambridge Computer Lab, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QG, UK