X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2066" "Mon" "20" "December" "93" "09:51:04" "LCL" "Mike Piff" "M.Piff@sheffield.ac.uk" nil "45" "Re: another forward: floats and LAMSTEX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA16068; Tue, 21 Dec 93 06:56:24 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA01965; Tue, 21 Dec 93 06:56:22 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA00639 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Tue, 21 Dec 1993 06:56:19 +0100 Message-Id: <199312210556.AA00639@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7973; Tue, 21 Dec 93 06:56:49 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7972; Tue, 21 Dec 1993 06:56:50 +0200 Received: from DHDURZ1 (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3910; Mon, 20 Dec 1993 10:54:17 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 20 Dec 93 09:51:04 LCL From: Mike Piff Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: Re: another forward: floats and LAMSTEX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1222 rfehren@hexi6.msd.anl.gov (Roland Fehrenbacher x5532) writes: %>(1) Concerning the issue of placing figures in LATEX, I just have a small %>remark. Even though I really do not like LATEX (the old version) I am still %>interested in what is going to happen with this package in the future. What I %>actually use is LAMSTEX, a package which combines many features of LATEX with %>the standard AMSTEX stuff. It is written by Spivak, the author of AMSTEX. Now %>my intention here is not to convert people from LATEX to LAMSTEX, but to point %>out that LAMSTEX has an excellent algorithm for figure placing, which leaves %>the choice of automatic or manual placement, and is very accurate, even when %>dealing with many figures. I wrote a couple of papers, and my thesis with it, %>and never had any complaints, whereas I had a lot of trouble when I used LATEX %>for my diploma thesis a couple of years back. I believe whoever wants to have a %>go in changing the figure placement for LATEX should consult LAMSTEX first. %> This prompted me to look at the parameters I used in a recent book, apart from htbp placement. \setcounter{totalnumber}{10} \setcounter{bottomnumber}{10} \renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0} \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0} \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.0} \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.8} In other words, stick it where you can in this order, with little restriction on the proportion of text and floats, or number of floats. Does anyone have any examples where this fails badly, and/or is worse than the method used in lamstex? Mike Piff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% Dr M J Piff %% e-mail: %% School of Mathematics and Statistics %% %% University of Sheffield %% M.Piff@sheffield.ac.uk %% Hicks Building %% %% SHEFFIELD S3 7RH %% Telephone: (0742) 824431 %% England %% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%