X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1891" "Tue" "9" "November" "93" "17:22:57" "+0100" "Anselm Lingnau" "lingnau@MATH.UNI-FRANKFURT.DE" nil "39" "Re: NF prefix, LaTeX/NFSS compatibility, etc" "^Date:" nil nil "11"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA09534; Tue, 9 Nov 93 17:19:56 +0100 Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA11233; Tue, 9 Nov 93 17:19:52 +0100 Message-Id: <9311091619.AA11233@sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3536; Tue, 09 Nov 93 17:18:31 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 1554; Tue, 09 Nov 93 17:18:24 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 1552; Tue, 09 Nov 93 17:18:22 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: (Your message of Tue, 09 Nov 93 15:40:26 GMT.) <9311091545.AA19918@gauss.math.uni-frankfurt.de> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 93 17:22:57 +0100 From: Anselm Lingnau Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: Re: NF prefix, LaTeX/NFSS compatibility, etc Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1127 Sebastian Rahtz writes: > are you saying that if you purchase ATM, you may only use the fonts > with that software? all ps2pk does is replace the rendering engine in > ATM, and the fonts are used in the same way for printer or screen. I > dont see the legal argument at all. your copy of Times was supplied to > use on screen and on paper Copyright issues like these are debatable and likely to stay that way until they have been resolved in court (and even that is no guarantee...) In Germany, there was essentially no copyright on most kinds of software until the beginning of this year. Now, with the (IMHO strange and quite unprecedented) legislature on software copyright that was introduced courtesy of the EEC, software, at least in theory, is protected to the extent that even loading a program into RAM from disk to run it can be construed as an infringement, let alone making backup copies or (choke) disassembling the program just to see what it does. On the other hand, it is perfectly legal to disassemble bits of a program if this is necessary to make it work with another program (`interoperability'). It is unclear how (if at all) this applies to computer-generated glyphs which a presumably copyrighted rendering engine produces from presumably copyrighted font descriptions. The legal trades will be able to live comfortably off such cases for a while yet. We may even see LaTeX3 released before we know whether re-rendering computerized font descriptions you legally own is allowed :^) So let's discuss other important things that really have to do with LaTeX3 instead of playing amateur lawyers. Anselm --- Anselm Lingnau .................................. lingnau@math.uni-frankfurt.de The way things are now (in the entire software industry), it's like having a racing bicycle with built-in training wheels that can't be removed. --- William R. Somsky