X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["439" "Sun" "7" "November" "93" "21:58:00" "-0700" "Michal Jaegermann" "michal@GORTEL.PHYS.UALBERTA.CA" nil "15" "Re: the name NFSS" "^Date:" nil nil "11"])
Return-Path: <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93)
	id AA03476; Mon, 8 Nov 93 06:14:12 +0100
Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93)
	id AA05592; Mon, 8 Nov 93 06:14:10 +0100
Message-Id: <9311080514.AA05592@sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE>
Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 9688; Mon, 08 Nov 93 06:12:51 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 0320;
 Mon, 08 Nov 93 06:12:40 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 0318;
 Mon, 08 Nov 93 06:12:39 CET
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To:  <93Nov7.203633mst.95582@relay.Phys.UAlberta.Ca>;
              from"spqr%FTP.TEX.AC.UK@VM.UCS.UALBERTA.CA" at Nov 6, 93 6:36 am
Date:         Sun, 7 Nov 93 21:58:00 -0700
From: Michal Jaegermann <michal@GORTEL.PHYS.UALBERTA.CA>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
To: Multiple Recipients of <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Subject:      Re: the name NFSS
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1102


>
> i'm with Frank. leave NFSS as it is.
>
> sebastian rahtz
>

Just to avoid misunderstandings.  I have nothing against NFSS name.
I was protesting against prefixing with 'nf' {\em style} names for
reasons I made abundatly clear, I hope.  So far nobody came strongly
in a support of the contrary position, although the discussion started
to diverge in many more or less tangential directions. Usual,
I presume. :-)

   Michal Jaegermann