X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["572" "Thu" "4" "November" "93" "20:12:07" "CET" "Dominik Wujastyk" "D.Wujastyk@UCL.AC.UK" nil "21" "Re: nf-prefix" "^Date:" nil nil "11"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA20315; Thu, 4 Nov 93 20:13:48 +0100 Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA28097; Thu, 4 Nov 93 20:13:46 +0100 Message-Id: <9311041913.AA28097@sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4843; Thu, 04 Nov 93 20:12:31 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 5886; Thu, 04 Nov 93 20:12:23 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 5884; Thu, 04 Nov 93 20:12:21 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Thu, 4 Nov 93 20:12:07 CET From: Dominik Wujastyk Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: Re: nf-prefix Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1092 I had a couple of messages on the nf- business, but Listserv wouldn't let me talk for a while, so I'm late to this debate. My two cents: let's chuck out the nf- prefix. And: let's drop the "N" in "NFSS". This has to go some time soon; why not now. Today. Some alternatives: OFSS orthogonal font selection scheme AFSS advanced font selection scheme LFSS LaTex font selection scheme FSS font selection scheme ... Dominik -- Dominik Wujastyk Phone (and voice messages): +44 71 611 8467 Wellcome Institute, 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE.