X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["772" "Tue" "4" "May" "93" "10:33:55" "MDT" "\"Jonathan M. Gilligan\"" "gilligan@CENTRAL.BLDRDOC.GOV" nil "17" "documentstyle option versions" "^Date:" nil nil "5"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 ) id AA28107; Tue, 4 May 93 18:36:16 +0200 Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/04.05.93) id AA23266; Tue, 4 May 93 18:36:12 +0200 Message-Id: <9305041636.AA23266@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5052; Tue, 04 May 93 18:35:46 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 5356; Tue, 04 May 93 18:35:43 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 5354; Tue, 04 May 93 18:35:41 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Mark Steinberger's message of Tue, 4 May 93 09:01:23 -0400 <9305041343.AA10868@central.bldrdoc.gov> Date: Tue, 4 May 93 10:33:55 MDT From: "Jonathan M. Gilligan" Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: documentstyle option versions Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1037 In all the reproofreading discussion, something is missing: in some media (articles to be printed in Physical Review Letters, for example), the stated policy of the publisher (The American Physical Society, in my example) is that in the interest of rapidly disseminating the results reported therein, ``proofs are not normally sent to authors.'' In this case, the accuracy with which a typescript or compuscript is translated to the printed page is of the utmost importance. In fact, The Physical Review has done an admirable job with their electronic submissions program (kudos to Chris Hamlin). Now I only wish that they'd support their normal typefaces (some variant of Times) for REVTeX submissions rather than setting their journal in two different fonts. ---Jon