X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["263" "Tue" "4" "May" "93" "09:01:23" "-0400" "Mark Steinberger" "mark@CS.ALBANY.EDU" nil "10" "Re: documentstyle option versions" "^Date:" nil nil "5"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 ) id AA27337; Tue, 4 May 93 16:09:37 +0200 Received: from by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/04.05.93) id AB22466; Tue, 4 May 93 16:09:30 +0200 Message-Id: <9305041409.AB22466@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4564; Tue, 04 May 93 15:05:29 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 3736; Tue, 04 May 93 15:05:28 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 3734; Tue, 04 May 93 15:05:26 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Tue, 4 May 93 09:01:23 -0400 From: Mark Steinberger Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: Re: documentstyle option versions Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1033 There are a number of reasons why documents should be reproofread when printed by the publisher. How do you know something didn't get chopped in the mail, for instance? Also, I think every document should be proofread by someone other than the author. --Mark