X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["184" "Sat" "6" "March" "93" "02:21:04" "CET" "Don Hosek" "DHOSEK@HMCVAX.CLAREMONT.EDU" nil "8" "Re: would a latex2.10 give a boost to latex3?" "^Date:" nil nil "3"])
Return-Path: <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 )
	id AA11693; Sat, 6 Mar 93 02:21:47 +0100
Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/19.6.92)
	id AA01316; Sat, 6 Mar 93 02:21:44 +0100
Message-Id: <9303060121.AA01316@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de>
Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2072; Sat, 06 Mar 93 02:22:02 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 9807;
 Sat, 06 Mar 93 02:22:00 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 9805;
 Sat, 06 Mar 93 02:21:58 CET
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Date:         Sat, 6 Mar 93 02:21:04 CET
From: Don Hosek <DHOSEK@HMCVAX.CLAREMONT.EDU>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
To: Multiple Recipients of <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Subject:      Re: would a latex2.10 give a boost to latex3?
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 995


A LaTeX 2.10 which has NFSS loaded with oldlfont as the default
would perhaps be the best plan. This would likely be NFSS1 and
would not invalidate any of the LaTeX manual.

MHO

-dh