X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["561" "Mon" "1" "March" "93" "14:37:32" "+0000" "Peter Abbott" "p.abbott@ASTON.AC.UK" nil "19" "Re: would a latex2.10 give a boost to latex3?" "^Date:" nil nil "3"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 ) id AA29611; Mon, 1 Mar 93 15:43:18 +0100 Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/19.6.92) id AA18124; Mon, 1 Mar 93 15:43:12 +0100 Message-Id: <9303011443.AA18124@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5600; Mon, 01 Mar 93 15:43:35 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 4133; Mon, 01 Mar 93 15:43:32 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 4131; Mon, 01 Mar 93 15:43:30 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 01 Mar 93 14:05:12 +0000. Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 14:37:32 +0000 From: Peter Abbott Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: Re: would a latex2.10 give a boost to latex3? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 988 > >The question arose in discussion of NFSS mark 2 of how to force sites >all over the world to move their LaTeX work over to the NFSS (and, to > It is interesting that this message has been circulated at this time. I was telephoned by a Mac user who does not have an electronic access to the TeX world. He would like a copy of NFSS to install into OzTeX 1.4. The set which is distributed from Aston on disc does NOT include NFSS as it is not yet the default. I for one would prefer it to be part and parcel of TeX distributions for ALL platforms. Peter