X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2544" "Mon" "8" "February" "93" "21:42:14" "CET" "Frank Mittelbach" "MITTELBACH@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "61" "using grids as a layout tool" "^Date:" nil nil "2"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 ) id AA26061; Mon, 8 Feb 93 21:41:50 +0100 Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/19.6.92) id AA02336; Mon, 8 Feb 93 21:41:46 +0100 Message-Id: <9302082041.AA02336@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de> Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0617; Mon, 08 Feb 93 21:42:32 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 6595; Mon, 08 Feb 93 21:42:28 CET Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 6593; Mon, 08 Feb 93 21:42:26 CET Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 8 Feb 93 21:42:14 CET From: Frank Mittelbach Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple Recipients of Subject: using grids as a layout tool Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 957 Barbara said, > what i've heard is that baseline alignment *is* mechanical, but it was > a desirable goal when printing was done with wet paper on inked metal > type, where it was impossible not to leave a real impression. it was > desirable not to have a raised impression from the reverse of a page > intruding on what someone was trying to read, so the alignment was > really aimed at front and back of the same sheet of paper. alignment > across facing pages then came automatically. This may be the origin but this argument is also true when using modern technology since often enough the paper used is not thick enough to completely prevent the black ink (or whatever it is:-) from the other side to shine through. From my experience this is far less distracting if the baselines from back and front (as well as the left and right margins!) match. Also, there are several design schools promoting the grid as an abstract design tool, see for example @STRING( VNR = {Van Nostrand Reinhold}) @STRING( a:VNR = {New York}) @book(VNR:AHu78, AUTHOR = {Allen Hurlburt}, TITLE = {The grid: A modular system for the design and production of newspapers, magazines, and books}, PUBLISHER = VNR, address = a:VNR, YEAR = 1978, source = {copy of book}, annote = {Explains reasons for the use of grid systems in the design of newspapers, magazines, and books. It contains many examples, actual layouts and their underlying grids. (FMi)\par A complete introduction to using grids in newspaper, magazine, and book design. (RRu)}, keywords = {Layout,Design,Typography,Grids} ) But in any way, I think this is wrong argument. I think the purpose of the ltx3 project should be to provide design possibilities and not to declare the `right way'. And designing by using a grid (and not only such a simple one concerning baselines) is certainly a valid and important design strategy and should therefore be supported by the ltx3 design language. This does *not* that I find it wrong to think about such issues and do research on them but this should be independent of this project. The whole thing reminds me on the discussions about whether or not an author-date scheme for bibliographies, or doing bibliographies in footnotes, or ... is obsolete and should be replaced by the only sensible way which is ....... This is not the right kind of approach; we should support various conventions because they mae sense for different communities. Frank