X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["532" "Mon" "5" "October" "92" "17:55:00" "LCL" "\"Juergen Egeling (FFT)\"" "RY90%DKAUNI2.bitnet@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de" nil "13" "Re: Letter style" "^Date:" nil nil "10"])
Return-Path: <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (serv01) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/1.9.92 )
	id AA09223; Mon, 5 Oct 92 18:11:25 +0100
Received: from vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (vm.hd-net.uni-heidelberg.de) by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.0/SMI-4.0-sc/19.6.92)
	id AA02132; Mon, 5 Oct 92 18:10:20 +0100
Message-Id: <9210051710.AA02132@sc.zib-berlin.dbp.de>
Received: from DHDURZ1 by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 4068; Mon, 05 Oct 92 18:10:55 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 4050;
 Mon, 05 Oct 92 18:10:51 CET
Received: from DHDURZ1 by DHDURZ1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) with BSMTP id 4047;
 Mon, 05 Oct 92 18:10:48 CET
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 92 17:55:00 LCL
From: "Juergen Egeling (FFT)" <RY90%DKAUNI2.bitnet@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
To: Multiple recipients of <LATEX-L@vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de>
Subject:      Re: Letter style
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 844


Moin,
> 		Please do not eliminate letter style for LaTeX. It is
> 	already easy to use, and I find it useful. I would support extending
dto.
I don't think it's the right way to say: If it does not suit
my needs in the exact way I will throw it away. But probably
those people are against an "iland" solution  and that's the
only point? In germany there is a "DIN" for letters, probably
in other countries it's the same, and that's what I do not
want to miss, even in the new LaTeX3
Juergen
P.S.: G. Greenwade, did you get my mail?