X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["214" "Tue" "25" "August" "92" "16:42:49" "CET" "Michael Downes" "MJD@MATH.AMS.ORG" nil "9" "RE: LaTeX3 volunteer task list" "^Date:" nil nil "8"])
Return-Path: <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1.BITNET@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (serv01) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/6.5.92 )
	id AA18267; Fri, 28 Aug 92 11:44:52 +0200
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.0/SMI-4.0-sc/19.6.92)
	id AA28588; Fri, 28 Aug 92 11:44:58 +0200
Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA22742
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.11]) for <Schoepf%SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:44:56 +0200
Message-Id: <199208280944.AA22742@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 1657; Fri, 28 Aug 92 11:39:50 +02
Received: from DB0TUI11 by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (Mailer R2.07B) with BSMTP id
 0176; Fri, 28 Aug 92 11:39:48 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To:  <01GNZKBYS35EASBSQP@MATH.AMS.ORG>
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 92 16:42:49 CET
From: Michael Downes <MJD@MATH.AMS.ORG>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Multiple recipients of <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject:      RE: LaTeX3 volunteer task list
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 745


> might even TUGboat or TTN be appropriate (for those
> without the 'benefit' of email)?
> malcolm clark

Absolutely---that is in the plans, I merely neglected to mention that
aspect in my previous mail.

Michael