Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.A7D176BC@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:44 +0100 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7D176BC" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: L3 suggestion: different file extension Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1992 10:28:53 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Dominik Wujastyk" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 681 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7D176BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This may be a bit radical, but could it be possible for LaTeX files to have the extension .ltx instead of .tex? I assume this is a function of tex the program, rather than of the LaTeX macros. But I mention it in case there is some clever way to achieve this by macro programming (Frank, Rainer and others have already managed several things I would have said were impossible with TeX). Dominik ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7D176BC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable L3 suggestion: different file extension

This may be a bit radical, but could it be possible = for LaTeX files
to have the extension .ltx instead of .tex?

I assume this is a function of tex the program, rather = than of the
LaTeX macros.  But I mention it in case there is = some clever way
to achieve this by macro programming (Frank, Rainer = and others
have already managed several things I would have said = were impossible
with TeX).

Dominik


------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7D176BC--