RE: Ignore spaces before \footnote ?

Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.A7667D6C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:43 +0100 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7667D6C" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil t nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Ignore spaces before \footnote ? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1992 15:03:32 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 678 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7667D6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Nelson Beebe writes: >> Another macro I'd like to see changed the same way is \index{} and = its >> relatives like \glossary, where it is equally vital that the index >> reference be tagged to the preceding word. I've more than once = been >> bitten by text like this: >> text text text >> \index{first entry} >> \index{second entry} >> text text text >> But neither \index nor \glossary produce a reference, so what is it >> that you want to see changed? `Produce a reference' seems somewhat ambiguous to me. But I can = certainly see what Nelson means:

could line-break (and subsequently page-break) between and , yielding an erroneous index entry. It would therefore be highly advantageous to ensure that was always tied to the preceding material. ** Phil. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7667D6C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Ignore spaces before \footnote ?

>> Nelson Beebe writes:

>>    Another macro I'd like to = see changed the same way is \index{} and its
>>    relatives like \glossary, = where it is equally vital that the index
>>    reference be tagged to the = preceding word. I've more than once been
>>    bitten by text like = this:

>>         text = text text
>>         = \index{first entry}
>>         = \index{second entry}
>>         text = text text

>> But neither \index nor \glossary produce a = reference, so what is it
>> that you want to see changed?

`Produce a reference' seems somewhat ambiguous to = me. But I can certainly
see what Nelson means:

could line-break (and subsequently page-break) between = <word> and
<index marker>, yielding an erroneous index = entry. It would therefore
be highly advantageous to ensure that <index = marker> was always tied
to the preceding <non-lwsp> material. ** = Phil.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A7667D6C--