Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.A4983C9C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:38 +0100 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A4983C9C" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: {1} Extending the lcircle fonts Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1992 16:55:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "malcolm" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Multiple recipients of" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 650 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A4983C9C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable on the face of it this sounds a good idea. if this (and similar `latex' fonts) are to be used fully, would they also be extended to 256 characters? and is the right list to be discussing this, or will rainer, the wrath of god, descend on us for misusing this valuable commodity? malcolm ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A4983C9C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: {1} Extending the lcircle fonts

on the face of it this sounds a good idea.
if this (and similar `latex' fonts) are to be
used fully, would they also be extended to
256 characters? and is the right list to
be discussing this, or will rainer, the wrath
of god, descend on us for misusing this = valuable
commodity?

malcolm

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.A4983C9C--