Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.9C4C0A8C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:24 +0100 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9C4C0A8C" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: {1} Re: {?} uppercase Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1992 09:51:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "malcolm" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Multiple recipients of" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 584 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9C4C0A8C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i'm encouraged by frank's reply (although he will be displeased to see me use the list for this purpose). latex3 is the goal. alerting frank to features that need consideration is well in order. expecting some tuning of latex2.09 is not. maybe there should be a quite separate list for 2.09? malcolm ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9C4C0A8C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable {1} Re: {?} uppercase

i'm encouraged by frank's reply (although he = will
be displeased to see me use the list for this = purpose).
latex3 is the goal. alerting frank to features
that need consideration is well in order. = expecting
some tuning of latex2.09 is not. maybe there = should
be a quite separate list for 2.09?

malcolm

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9C4C0A8C--