Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.9540C46C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <13197.9201071939@hilliard.ecs.soton.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9540C46C" Return-Path: <@vm.gmd.de:LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: RE:magsteps Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1992 12:47:26 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Sebastian Rahtz" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 529 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9540C46C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CA_ROWLEY@uk.ac.ou.acsvax writes: > Heh, great, if we dont need to worry about fudamental Tex problems > then we can finish it in about one-tenth of the time! But would it = be > worth having: "papering over the cracks" is what it's all about, I'm > afraid. if you and Frank want a perfect world, then rewrite TeX. but you are going to compromise anyway, so why worry about the cracks? yes, i *would* like a `paper LaTeX' sooner than one which had beaten Hawking to the job. I though the impetus of LaTeX3 was towards a decent interface for style designers... sebastian ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9540C46C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: RE:magsteps

CA_ROWLEY@uk.ac.ou.acsvax writes:
 > Heh, great, if we dont need to worry about = fudamental Tex problems
 > then we can finish it in about one-tenth = of the time!  But would it be
 > worth having: "papering over the = cracks" is what it's all about, I'm
 > afraid.
if you and Frank want a perfect world, then rewrite = TeX. but you are
going to compromise anyway, so why worry about the = cracks? yes, i
*would* like a `paper LaTeX' sooner than one which = had beaten Hawking
to the job. I though the impetus of LaTeX3 was = towards a decent
interface for style designers...

sebastian


------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9540C46C--