Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.9522340C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <13176.9201071936@hilliard.ecs.soton.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9522340C" Return-Path: <@vm.gmd.de:LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Ending the tyranny of magsteps! Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1992 12:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Sebastian Rahtz" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 528 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9522340C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable aargh. Don's mega listing beat me. but now I believe him. But i notice the same old rubbish creeping in. Why does anyone used \sl? I've always thought it was horrible (sorry, Barbara, I know TUB uses it, and it loosk awful there too...). what *is* cmssdc? This is nothing to do with LaTeX-L, so please forget I said this here. sebastian ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9522340C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: Ending the tyranny of magsteps!

aargh. Don's mega listing beat me. but now I believe = him. But i notice
the same old rubbish creeping in.  Why does = anyone used \sl? I've
always thought it was horrible (sorry, Barbara, I = know TUB uses it,
and it loosk awful there too...). what *is* = cmssdc?

This is nothing to do with LaTeX-L, so please forget I = said this here.

sebastian

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.9522340C--