Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.92AFA45C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: CHAA006%VAX.RHBNC.AC.UK@vm.gmd.de's message of Tue, 7 Jan 92 17:04:10 BST <9201071923.AA03270@ufer.ZIB-Berlin.DE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.92AFA45C" Return-Path: <@vm.gmd.de:LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) x-to: LATEX-L%DHDURZ1.BITNET@vm.gmd.de Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: re: fontdef issues Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1992 20:30:34 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Rainer Schoepf" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 505 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.92AFA45C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Phil's main point is that "for this use at least, \magsteps are mandatory". I understand from this that it is not a question of plain vs. LaTeX -- which is what I suspected from the beginning. Rainer ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.92AFA45C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: re: fontdef issues

Phil's main point is that "for this use at least, = \magsteps are
mandatory". I understand from this that it is = not a question of plain
vs. LaTeX -- which is what I suspected from the = beginning.

Rainer

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.92AFA45C--