Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.90F476EC@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:44:05 +0100 Return-Path: <@vm.gmd.de:LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.90F476EC" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil t nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: RE:magsteps Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1992 10:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Dominik Wujastyk" Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 495 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.90F476EC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sebastian writes: \begin{quotation} > Mind you, all this stuff about CMR fonts is all dead end. Surely the > politically corrtect future is rasterizing being done by the printer, > as PS does (even if Ps is not perfect)? \end{quotation} So who's going to be the first manufacturer to put a hardware-resident Metafont engine into a printer? Wouldn't that be something? Of course, MF files might need to be compressed somehow. But still. Dominik ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.90F476EC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: RE:magsteps

Sebastian writes:
\begin{quotation}
 > Mind you, all this stuff about CMR fonts = is all dead end. Surely the
 > politically corrtect future is rasterizing = being done by the printer,
 > as PS does (even if Ps is not = perfect)?
\end{quotation}

So who's going to be the first manufacturer to put a = hardware-resident
Metafont engine into a printer?  Wouldn't that = be something?  Of course,
MF files might need to be compressed somehow.  = But still.

Dominik



------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.90F476EC--