Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.4DADAB9C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:42:13 +0100 Return-Path: <@vm.gmd.de:LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4DADAB9C" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil t nil nil nil nil nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: References and citations (1) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1991 22:33:10 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 452 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4DADAB9C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nico once (5th March 1991) remarked that it struck him as odd that = tagging of \bibitems is done outside LaTeX. I was invited to submit some comments to the Text Encoding Initiative = about how they might treat references and citations (in spite of my lack of knowledge of TEI and SGML!). My attempt to produce something for them involved some consideration that is analogous to "if \bibitems were = tagged internally, what structures might have to be tagged internally?". This somewhat tenuous link is why my next mail will be a copy of the notes I = did for TEI. [I think that the file is about 45K, so should get through mailers OK.] = David ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4DADAB9C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References and citations (1)

Nico once (5th March 1991) remarked that it struck him = as odd that tagging
of \bibitems is done outside LaTeX.

I was invited to submit some comments to the Text = Encoding Initiative about
how they might treat references and citations (in = spite of my lack of
knowledge of TEI and SGML!).  My attempt to = produce something for them
involved some consideration that is analogous to = "if \bibitems were tagged
internally, what structures might have to be tagged = internally?".  This
somewhat tenuous link is why my next mail will be a = copy of the notes I did
for TEI.  [I think that the file is about 45K, = so should get through
mailers OK.]

          &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;           &n= bsp;          David

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4DADAB9C--