Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.4A65294C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:42:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4A65294C" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX 2.09 beta-test Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1991 01:00:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 414 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4A65294C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don Hosek writes: > True, but unimportant. I know of no TeX format which loads a > ... > ... ..., I can think of no good > reason why US English should *not* be language 0. \begin{flame} This xchr/xord discussion is something I'd rather watch than participate in, but this is just b*llshit! I just hate this stupid Anglo-American chauvinism with respect to languages. \end{flame} Nico Poppelier ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4A65294C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX 2.09 <Oct 91> beta-test

Don Hosek writes:

> True, but unimportant. I know of no TeX format = which loads a
> ...
> = ...           &nbs= p;            = ;          ..., I can think = of no good
> reason why US English should *not* be language = 0.
\begin{flame}
This xchr/xord discussion is something I'd rather = watch than
participate in, but this is just b*llshit! I just = hate this stupid
Anglo-American chauvinism with respect to = languages.
\end{flame}

Nico Poppelier


------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4A65294C--