Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.46748CEC@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:42:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <03F0DB7BA0006F72@HEARNVAX.nic.SURFNET.SURF.400net.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.46748CEC" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Should tables expand to width of text-column? Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1991 01:00:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 378 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.46748CEC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bad design or not, tables filled out to column width is house style in several of our journals, among which a few of our important physics = journals. Better facilities for tabular* should certainly be part of LaTeX 3! Nico ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.46748CEC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Should tables expand to width of text-column?

Bad design or not, tables filled out to column width = is house style in
several of our journals, among which a few of our = important physics journals.
Better facilities for tabular* should certainly be = part of LaTeX 3!

Nico


------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.46748CEC--