Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.4180255C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:41:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4180255C" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: chapter complications Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 14:57:27 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 327 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4180255C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bearing in mind Franks' frequent injunctions to make a contribution rather than allow silence to imply tactit acceptance, I would like to add my vote to support (front matter, body matter, back matter). Strangely I would prefer end matter to back matter for reasons which are not clear even to me, but realise that the term is ambiguous and could encompass front matter as well as back matter. ** Phil. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4180255C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: chapter complications

Bearing in mind Franks' frequent injunctions to make a = contribution
rather than allow silence to imply tactit acceptance, = I would like
to add my vote to support (front matter, body matter, = back matter).
Strangely I would prefer end matter to back matter = for reasons which
are not clear even to me, but realise that the term = is ambiguous and
could encompass front matter as well as back = matter.

        =         =         =         =         ** = Phil.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4180255C--