Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.4133BC6C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:41:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4133BC6C" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: publishing-industry standards Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 09:34:57 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 325 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4133BC6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The TEI draft report is certainly easier to read than the AAP = documentation. Furthermore, the AAP dtd is more or less a dtd for the exact sciences, = you know: with lots of math and tables. TEI aims at linguistics, humanities, = etc. It is useful to have a look at both, since two of the flaws of LaTeX's document styles are, in my opinion, 1. not enough structure 2. aimed at exact sciences (with exception of chemistry), hardly usable for humanities Nico ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4133BC6C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: publishing-industry standards

The TEI draft report is certainly easier to read than = the AAP documentation.
Furthermore, the AAP dtd is more or less a dtd for = the exact sciences, you
know: with lots of math and tables. TEI aims at = linguistics, humanities, etc.
It is useful to have a look at both, since two of the = flaws of LaTeX's
document styles are, in my opinion,

1. not enough structure
2. aimed at exact sciences (with exception of = chemistry),
   hardly usable for humanities

Nico

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.4133BC6C--