Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.40C8C31C@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:41:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.40C8C31C" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: publishing-industry standards Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1991 17:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 321 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.40C8C31C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nico writes (apart from the very useful earlier parts of his message): > [Another interesting initiative in the SGML field is the TEI = initiative, > which is an initiative from the area of humanities and linguistics. A > different approach, but draft version 1.1 of TEI P1 contains = interesting > thoughts.] [TEI =3D Text Encoding Initiative] I have not read this document but knew of its existence: my reason for not metioning it in my message is that my understanding of the TEI project is that it is intended to code a far larger range of "texts" (in particular, historical material) and a far larger range of properties of those texts (eg what prining press and which compositor produced them) than any system aimed at typesetting documents would need to encompass. Nevertheless, I am sure it contains some matter of interest. Is it any easier to study than the AAPs DTD? chris ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.40C8C31C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: publishing-industry standards

Nico writes (apart from the very useful earlier parts = of his message):

> [Another interesting initiative in the SGML field = is the TEI initiative,
> which is an initiative from the area of = humanities and linguistics. A
> different approach, but draft version 1.1 of TEI = P1 contains interesting
> thoughts.]
[TEI =3D Text Encoding Initiative]
I have not read this document but knew of its = existence:
my reason for not metioning it in my message is that = my understanding
of the TEI project is that it is intended to code a = far larger range
of "texts" (in particular, historical = material) and a far larger range
of properties of those texts (eg what prining press = and which
compositor produced them) than any system aimed at = typesetting
documents would need to encompass.

Nevertheless, I am sure it contains some matter of = interest.  Is it
any easier to study than the AAPs DTD?

chris

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.40C8C31C--