Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19443.400218AC@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:41:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.400218AC" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [David_Rhead@vme.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk: Styles in 3.0 "standard di stribution"] Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1991 14:22:53 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: Sender: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" To: "Rainer M. Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 312 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.400218AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This message is partly to see if I can send to latex-l (apologies to rainer if it does not), and partly to say that David Rhead's suggestions seem to be a very reasonable outline programme for when we get to that stage. However, in the last sentence, he says: > I'd suggest a move towards the "publishing-industry standard" = structures. > The only such standard I know of at present for the logical structure of books is the AAP's DTD. I should therefore like to hear people's views as to whether we should be thinking about doing this and, also, from those more familiar with it (Nico!), whether it would be feasible/sensible etc. chris ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.400218AC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [David_Rhead@vme.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk: Styles in 3.0 = "standard di stribution"]

This message is partly to see if I can send to latex-l = (apologies to
rainer if it does not),  and partly to
say that David Rhead's suggestions seem to be a very = reasonable
outline programme for when we get to that = stage.

However, in the last sentence, he says:

> I'd suggest a move towards the = "publishing-industry standard" structures.
>
The only such standard I know of at present for the = logical structure
of books is the AAP's DTD.

I should therefore like to hear people's views as to = whether we should
be thinking about doing this and, also, from those = more familiar with
it (Nico!), whether it would be feasible/sensible = etc.


chris


------_=_NextPart_001_01C19443.400218AC--