Received: by nummer-3.proteosys id <01C19442.D32F0ADC@nummer-3.proteosys>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:38:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C19442.D32F0ADC" x-vm-v5-data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil][nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: embedded arguments in titles Date: Thu, 16 Aug 1990 17:16:56 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "bbeeton" To: "Rainer Schoepf" Reply-To: "LaTeX-L Mailing list" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 223 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19442.D32F0ADC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable this is an expansion of the problem described in nico's message on \thanks in titles. uppercasing can also affect math expressions in titles, for example ... $f(x,y)$ where ordinary letters appear, not just control sequences. mike spivak, for an old version (0.something) of amstex, solved the math part of the problem by ingesting tokens one by one, processing them and spitting them back out into another string, and within math, omitting the uppercasing. i don't remember whether he solved the footnote problem, but in any case, the code was so complicated that it was abandoned for the current version of amstex, and indeed, double input (yech!) may be required. i may be able to exhume the antique code for this, if it would be of any help to anyone. -- bb ------_=_NextPart_001_01C19442.D32F0ADC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable embedded arguments in titles

this is an expansion of the problem described in = nico's message on
\thanks in titles.  uppercasing can also affect = math expressions
in titles, for example
        ... = $f(x,y)$
where ordinary letters appear, not just control = sequences.
mike spivak, for an old version (0.something) of = amstex, solved the
math part of the problem by ingesting tokens one by = one, processing
them and spitting them back out into another string, = and within math,
omitting the uppercasing.  i don't remember = whether he solved the
footnote problem, but in any case, the code was so = complicated that
it was abandoned for the current version of amstex, = and indeed,
double input (yech!) may be required.
i may be able to exhume the antique code for this, if = it would be of
any help to anyone.
          &nbs= p;            = ;            =             &= nbsp;        -- bb

------_=_NextPart_001_01C19442.D32F0ADC--