X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil]
	[nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil])
Date:         Mon, 16 Jul 90 18:16:48 CET
From: Rainer Schoepf <BK4@DHDURZ1.bitnet>
Organization: Inst. f. Theor. Physik d. Univ. Heidelberg
Subject:      Re: Auxiliary files
To: LaTeX discussion list <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.uucp>
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 183

Rainer,

I've worked on the partial tables this weekend and now have a more
or less satisfactory version. I've replaced a few constructions
by token list registers, which seems to be a nice and efficient solution.
I wonder why LL prefers complicated \edef constructions over token list
registers.
The contents of the .aux and other table files are now more or less
settled, sotoday I've worked on the parts of latex.tex and the styles
that write information *to* the .aux and table files. That part
is also nearly finished, but it still needs to be tested.

...

I still think we can dismiss section numbering 2.1, 2.1', 2.2
as bad document structure. Equation numbering of this kind has a function,
i.e. to indicate original and rewritten forms of formulae or theorems.
.
Sections are not rewritten in this sense.

But if a certain number of votes in favour can be counted, we must
certainly implement this feature.

Nico