X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t nil]
	[nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil])
Date:         Tue, 27 Feb 90 13:12:00 GMT
Reply-To: LaTeX-L Mailing list <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1@unido.bitnet>
Sender: LaTeX-L Mailing list <LATEX-L%DHDURZ1@unido.bitnet>
From: MALCOLM@ICRF.AC.UK
Subject:      more indexes etc.
To: Rainer Schoepf <BK4@DHDURZ1.uucp>
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 33

part of my latex wish list encompasses the inclusion
of more than one index: for example, it is not uncommon
to require an index of e.g. people, places, etc, as well
as the more conventional (or even in addition to) compound
index. yes, it is not difficult to see how this might be
generalised at present, but it would be kind to acknowledge
its likelihood. similarly, i am oft beset by the problem of
trademarks: i can see how to handle this with citations  which
are \nocite-d, and their own little database (or extremely large
database), but i start running into problems, both in formatting,
and when i want more than one `bibliography'.
are these legitimate concerns of a future LaTeX?

malcolm